Ross Boylan wrote:
> Item x: Deletion of Disk-Based Volumes
> Date: Nov 25, 2005
> Original: Ross Boylan <RossBoylan at stanfordalumni dot org>
> Status: Proposal
>
> What: It would be useful to control how long the actual backups were
> kept for those backups that went to disk-based volumes. A range of
> options similar to those currently available for retaining catalog
> information would be useful. An additional option to permit deletion
> of the actual backup when the record of the associated job and/or
> files is purged from the catalog would also be useful. However, it
> should be possible for the actual backups to be retained for more or
> less time than the associated catalog records.
I suggest this could be accomplished with the addition of a single
optional Pool directive valid only for disk volumes:
Delete Volume When Pruned = Yes
--
Phil Stracchino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Renaissance Man, Unix generalist, Perl hacker
Mobile: 603-216-7037 Landline: 603-886-3518
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
