Thanks for your quick response. They are marked "full". When I "inherited" this setup, I noticed (using the GUI), that all the tapes in my Oracle pool were marked "purge". I have no idea why my predecessor did that, or if he even did it or bacula did it unintentionally. Could that be the problem??
Here's my pool config. The Oracle pool is the one I'm having issues with. Thanks. # Default pool definition Pool { Name = Default Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes # Bacula can automatically recycle Volumes AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired volumes Volume Retention = 365 days # one year Accept Any Volume = yes # write on any volume in the pool } Pool { Name = Windows Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes AutoPrune = yes Volume Retention = 120 days Accept Any Volume = yes } Pool { Name = UnixOS Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes AutoPrune = yes Volume Retention = 5 days Accept Any Volume = yes # Catalog Files = no } Pool { Name = BrutusImages Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes AutoPrune = yes Volume Retention = 5 days Accept Any Volume = yes Catalog Files = no } Pool { Name = Oracle Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes AutoPrune = yes Volume Retention = 10 days Accept Any Volume = yes -----Original Message----- From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 8:46 AM To: Lowe, Bryan Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Tapes full? Lowe, Bryan wrote: > Hello List- > > I'm a bacula newbie that inherited this bacula setup from my > predecessor. It seems to work very well. > > I have 3 separate tape drives for 3 separate backup pools. They are > Oracle, Unix, and Images. All 3 are set up exactly the same way, except > the Oracle jobs run nightly while the Unix and Images jobs only run once > a week. > > I'm having a problem with my Oracle backups that I can't seem to put my > finger on. I'm using SuperDLT tapes, 160GB/320GB. However, when bacula > writes to the tape, it says that the tape is full only after writing > less than 1GB! Sometimes it will only write like 7MB! Then it prompts me > for the next available tape. I can verify that I'm not having this > problem if dumping directly to tape from command line. I also tried > putting through a cleaning tape. Does anyone have any idea what could > cause this, or where I should start looking? Are they marked "Full" or "Used"? What does your Pool configuration look like? -- Phil Stracchino [EMAIL PROTECTED] Renaissance Man, Unix generalist, Perl hacker Mobile: 603-216-7037 Landline: 603-886-3518 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users