Just couple of thoughts. I've got email, with subject line saying my restore failed. Almost gave me heart attack. Then I realized it was just one of the log files (size probably changed while Bacula was reading it), and all the other files (that I actaully cared about) were restored correctly.
Would it be better if this was reported as warning? Or even better, reported as warning during the backup? The former would be less confusing to the user (OK, all your files were restored, but here are some warnings about them). And a lot safer too. No heart attacks what you get that email with subject line saying the restore failed. However it is already too late to do anything about the file the error/warning is complaining about. The later might be better time to complain (issue warning), since usually something can be done about it (if needed) while the file warning is about is still "safe" on the disc ;-) -- Aleksandar Milivojevic ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
