Hi,
On 14.09.2005 23:37, Jonte Norman wrote:
...
Bacula can only do an automatic restore from a single storage device with a
single media type, anything more complicated (two different storage devices
or multiple media types) you must handle manually. This is not easy, but I
documented it somewhere for those who really want to sweat it out during a
restore ...
I am not sure I understand what you mean by automatic versus manual
restore... By automatic restore, do you mean a regular restore with
for example wx-console? And if so, what do you mean by manual restore?
I think that Kern refers to "automatic restore" as a restore process
which only uses tools and commands bacula implements, because a "manual
restore" in this case requires - manually, of course - modifying the bsr
file bacula creates for the job, and later pushing some data taken from
the aforementioned bsr file into other jobs.
Does Bacula stable and beta handle restores the same way or do you
think I be better of with the stable version?
Usually you're better off with the stable version. I see no difference
in handling restores, and, while the developers are surely glad when
more people deliver qualified bug reports, preparing and submitting
these reports is definitely work, takes time, and still you can't be
sure bacula does what you want it to do.
Arno
--
IT-Service Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arno Lehmann http://www.its-lehmann.de
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
