Jeronimo Zucco wrote:
> Stranger that headers have the correct date, but the client (many,
> include webmail) cannot interpret the date. Any caracter not recognized
> on the field date ?
>
> Follow an header for example:
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: from gaia.ucs.br (unknown [200.160.143.250])
> by ops.ucs.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AD1280079;
> Tue, 30 Aug 2005 02:11:15 -0300 (BRT)
> Received: from gaia.ucs.br (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> by localhost.ucs.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167461902D9;
> Tue, 30 Aug 2005 02:11:15 -0300 (BRT)
> Received: from bacula.ucs.br (unknown [200.160.143.251])by gaia.ucs.br
> (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A98190247;Tue, 30 Aug 2005 02:11:14
> -0300 (BRT)
> Received: from bacula.ucs.br (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])by
> bacula.ucs.br (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7U5BElS018112;Tue,
> 30 Aug 2005
> 02:11:14 -0300
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bacula)
> Subject: Bacula: Backup OK of pavati-fd (PavatiJob) Full on QVD031L2
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Ter, 30 Ago 2005 02:11:14 -0300
.....Yeah, I don't see anything wrong with that.
Does the date-misreading problem occur on more than one machine?
--
Phil Stracchino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Renaissance Man, Unix generalist, Perl hacker
Mobile: 603-216-7037 Landline: 603-886-3518
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
