On Wed, Aug 24, 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Wednesday 24 August 2005 16:41, Matthias Kurz wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > If you want to read about my idea, please visit: > > > http://www.bacula.org/OpenSourceFunding.html Your comments are welcome. > > > > Hi. > > > > Can you say with few words what the consequences of this are for > > (free) packaging projects like Debian, BSD ports, OpenPKG,... ? > > No change, because to the best of my knowledge none of these use Bacula > binaries.
Well, when you mean "http://www.bacula.org/OpenSourceFunding.html" with "the doc". I did read it before i posted :-) And the last sentence in the paragraph "Fee structure" reads: "... By the way, a source rpm would probably be included in the binary license since it is also a binary even if it does contain the source." > If some Open Source project wants to re-distribute our binaries, we will need > to discuss it. > > > > > Are they allowed to continue building and distributing packages without > > any restriction ? > > Yes, of course. The source is open for everyone to use. Even companies and > others can avoid any charges by building from source. Sorry, when i pester you too much :) Will there be restrictions in the _distribution_ of source rpms or the like ? (mk) -- Matthias Kurz; Fuldastr. 3; D-28199 Bremen; VOICE +49 421 53 600 47 >> Im prämotorischen Cortex kann jeder ein Held sein. (bdw) << ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users