On Monday 22 August 2005 04:32, Peter Sjoberg wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 01:38 -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > Thomas Simmons wrote:
> > > No one has any thoughts on this?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > > Thomas Simmons wrote:
> > >> Hello Everyone,
> > >> From what I understand, if I have "Full Backup Pool = Full-Pool" in
> > >> the job resource then any job on that client that gets upgraded to
> > >> full, should use the "Full-Pool". This is not happening and is really
> > >> a big problem for laptops that are not on site everynight. If the
> > >> laptop misses the normal full backup, the job will go to a tape in the
> > >> "Inc-Pool", which has a much shorter retention period than the
> > >> "Full-Pool". Here's a few snippets from my config files and some
> > >> bacula output. Thanks for any help with this.
> >
> > There is, to my recollection, a long-standing bug in this regard that
> > when a job is automatically promoted to a higher level, any specific
> > Pool for that level is not applied.
> >
> > I don't know what the status is on fixing this behavior.
>
> I can't guarantee that the bug is fixed but I was just running the
> latest cvs version and there it did use the proper pool when I just
> kicked of a Inc on a brand new system.
This is good news. So it seems that at least we are making some progress. As
I said, I think you will find things better, but it is new code, and it is a
new algorithm, so it would not surprise me to find some problems ...
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
