On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 01:38 -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote: > Thomas Simmons wrote: > > No one has any thoughts on this? > > > > Thanks, > > Thomas > > > > Thomas Simmons wrote: > > > >> Hello Everyone, > >> From what I understand, if I have "Full Backup Pool = Full-Pool" in > >> the job resource then any job on that client that gets upgraded to > >> full, should use the "Full-Pool". This is not happening and is really > >> a big problem for laptops that are not on site everynight. If the > >> laptop misses the normal full backup, the job will go to a tape in the > >> "Inc-Pool", which has a much shorter retention period than the > >> "Full-Pool". Here's a few snippets from my config files and some > >> bacula output. Thanks for any help with this. > > > There is, to my recollection, a long-standing bug in this regard that > when a job is automatically promoted to a higher level, any specific > Pool for that level is not applied. > > I don't know what the status is on fixing this behavior. I can't guarantee that the bug is fixed but I was just running the latest cvs version and there it did use the proper pool when I just kicked of a Inc on a brand new system. >
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
