On Thursday 28 July 2005 16:17, Volker Sauer wrote:
> > I'll run the dirctor under the debugger and we'll see..
>
> Short question on this:
> I rebuilt the bacula package and removed the "strip" commands from the
> build script. The result is the unstripped binary of bacula-dir.
> What I'll do now is copy only this unstripped binary to the
> production machine and run it under the debugger. Is this ok? Does the
> sourcecode need to be anywhere on the production host?
That is fine. It will provide names and line numbers of the source, but the
source itself is not referenced and need not be on the machine.
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September
19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
