Kern Sibbald wrote: >> > Normally, there is no reason to fiddle with trying to create a >> "bacula" >> > user on Windows it only complicates things. >> That's good to know (and certainly matches up with my experience so >> far). > My experience with Microsoft says that it is probably not the same thing > to be > logged in as a domain administrator and as the Administrator. You are exactly right. There's more than one admin role according to AD: Enterprise Admin, Schema Admin and the good old printer etc. admins.
> As usual, Microsoft seems to have complicated things even more with every > release, and if your files that cannot be backed up participate in the > Active > Directory, then you may need to run Bacula under a Domain Admin userid > rather > than SYSTEM. With AD the scenario almost the same as with Samba. You have to have permissions at samba/AD level and sufficient permissions at filesystem level too. Or move the user who runs bacula into the Domain Admins group. bye, Ago ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track? If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy. Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
