Hello, I get a good number of requests to change the list behavior to "mung" the Reply-To. It might perhaps help me avoid getting two copies of most emails I send that get answered, and help those that forget to use the "Respond to all", but as the first of the articles points out, it can create a number of problems.
So, I don't currently plan to change the way the list works in processing the headers. On Tuesday 17 May 2005 14:34, Henry Yen wrote: ... > > > While we're at it. It would be nice to have the reply-to field set to > > the list where the mail came from and not to the person who sent the > > mail. Even though I switched to a mail client that has a send to all > > button, I constantly forget that I have to press on that one to get mail > > delivered correctly for this list. > > The two opposing positions are: > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html > > I have no particular opinion one way or another, but popular sentiment > (including mailman's default settings) very much favor the first of the > two. -- Best regards, Kern ("> /\ V_V ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
