>>>>> On Sat, 7 May 2005 12:02:40 -0400, John Hayden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

  John>         Except, the same code on another RH9 system only spawns 1 
instance and 
  John> on this system all 3 instances are listening on port 9102. It would 
  John> seem to me that multiple instances should be listening on different 
  John> ports. I'm fairly certain there should only be on instance of bacula-fd 
  John> starting when one does a ./bacula start.  I'm certain there is 
  John> something wrong on this system, its just that I have no clue on where 
  John> to look.

What you describe sounds like threads (and I'm pretty sure that it is
impossible to two processes to listen on the same port on Linux).

Bacula-fd is multithreaded and threads are implemented using multiple pids on
some Linux kernels.  I'm not sure why it would be different on the other
machine unless they have been upgraded from the baseline RH9 in different
ways, but you could check both systems with the -m option to ps to show all
threads.

__Martin


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to