This reply is still going to the list because it concerns the transparency of the design process as a whole and is not restricted to OMG-related issues.
(in my opinion) If you don't agree, it's going to be my last. Can you point to another list which would be more adequate? > UIF mention of the "documentation writers and translators" is the Ubuntu > Docs team and the Ubuntu Translators. And not the Ubuntu Manual. And > UIFe are granted by those two teams. Is it? Doesn't the Docs team sometimes need screenshots too? > Now what are we really worried about ? The UIF or the wallpaper? > We must realize we cant have both of those. ;) That's *exactly* my point. The way I see it, there are two possibilities: a) The wallpaper is final. In this case, the concerns *are* valid and your whole point about people complaining before knowing is moot. (there is the problem of rudeness, but this is a separate matter to be discussed separately) b) The wallpaper is not final. In this case, what exactly the users are guilty of? Of trusting the UIF? Of not knowing that the UIF is unreliable, despite the fact that there are no mentions of that in the wiki? Yes, perhaps there was an overreaction, but I wouldn't call "trusting the release schedule" a "lack of responsibility". I don't disagree that the OMG users (and some of its owners) sometimes need a change in attitude. But shifting the entire blame to OMG and not seeing the design transparency problems this "hysteria" is a symptom of is a mistake. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
