> -----Original Message----- > From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org [mailto:avr- > gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Georg- > Johann Lay > Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 9:01 AM > To: Dmitry > Cc: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Speeding [u]ltoa by 35% > > Concerning sprintf: what's the avr-libc policy here?
In general, our users will complain if code size increases, even by a trivial amount. It is only rarely (or never) that I hear a complaint that the code is not fast enough. And even then, they typically talk about speed of executing an ISR, not mainline code. Because of that, IMHO, size of the code is much more critical than speed. Having said that, though, I'm not against having additional, alternative functions that optimize speed, as long as the default is for size. Eric _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
