Joerg Wunsch schrieb:
Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de> wrote:
Here is a commented version with an average time reduction
of ~45% for the signed version.
Can you submit it as a patch report?
hmmm, I don't know enough about the lib to prepare a proper
patch, e.g.
- changes to the build system / infrastructure
- coding conventions (comments, indenting, ...)
If the maintainers don't like the C code, they can use the
sanity check from the original post to get a pure assembler
implementation and equal code size.
C code is fine, the only reason for writing parts in assembly was to
gain something over the C version.
How far might the C code go? Could it use asm to explicitly describe the
interface to an assembler function to implement a transparent call?
Johann
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
