Avrora's main advantage is that it simulates radio chips (CC1000, CC2420,
etc.) found on sensor network nodes. These would be a lot of trouble to
replicate, so I doubt that Avrora's going to go away no matter how good
the new simulavr gets. Avrora is also very easy to extend compared to
every other simulator I've hacked.
John Regehr
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:13:52AM -0600, Weddington, Eric wrote:
There's a lot of new work being done at the SimulAVR project:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/simulavr>
FYI: There's avrora [1] as well. While it's written in Java (which I detest),
it worked so much better for me than simulavr* that I switched (and even
wrote patches).
Don't know how much simulavrxx evolved since, though.
[1] http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/avrora/
CU Sascha
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
