On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Tristan Gingold <ging...@adacore.com> wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Weddington, Eric wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> There's a lot of new work being done at the SimulAVR project: >> <http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/simulavr> > > > Before working on avrtest, I tried simulavr. It was so broken that I gave > up. > I think you don't need to keep backward compatibility.
I looked at simulavr a while ago and it also seemed to not do what I needed. So one more "don't need backward compatibility" vote from me. -- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too? _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
