Peter Donald wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 01:04, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Peter, you mentioned in another thread that the DefaultConfigurationBuilder
was altered in a way that broke your code. I think you even included a
ClassicConfigurationBuilder to provide a compatibility layer.
yep ;)
Looking back (hindsight is always 20/20) we should make the DefaultConfigurationBuilder the NamespacedConfigurationBuilder, and promote ClassicConfigurationBuilder to DefaultConfigurationBuilder.
Or maybe we could just pass a boolean into DefaultConfigurationBuilders constructor indicating whether it should be namespace enabled or not.
If you are going to make changes I also wouldn't mind renaming ClassicSAXConfigurationHandler to SAXConfigurationHandler and SAXConfigurationHandler to NamespaceSAXConfigurationHandler
Didn't that diff arive yet saying *exactly* the same thing?
I will commit it in the morning if all are in favor (it's on my machine at work).
---------------------------------------------------- Sign Up for NetZero Platinum Today Only $9.95 per month! http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
