On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 01:04, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Peter, you mentioned in another thread that the DefaultConfigurationBuilder > was altered in a way that broke your code. I think you even included a > ClassicConfigurationBuilder to provide a compatibility layer.
yep ;) > Looking back > (hindsight is always 20/20) we should make the DefaultConfigurationBuilder > the NamespacedConfigurationBuilder, and promote ClassicConfigurationBuilder > to DefaultConfigurationBuilder. Or maybe we could just pass a boolean into DefaultConfigurationBuilders constructor indicating whether it should be namespace enabled or not. If you are going to make changes I also wouldn't mind renaming ClassicSAXConfigurationHandler to SAXConfigurationHandler and SAXConfigurationHandler to NamespaceSAXConfigurationHandler -- Cheers, Pete --------------------------------------------------------- Clarke's Third Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced". --------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
