> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:24, Leo Sutic wrote: > > > > I'd say IoC promotes flexibility like nothing else I've ever > seen. As far > > as the logging discussions go, I say Berin *restored* IoC in logging by > > who did that ? ;)
Argh. Sorry. Berin made the initial announcement (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-dev&m=100447702127516&w=2) and (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-dev&m=100454476023586&w=2), so I guess I just attached his name to that API in my mind. But in Logger.java there is indeed a @author <a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Peter Donald</a> Sorry about that. > For small projects it easier to > hardwire bits together - as long as you know that the small project will > never grow ;) Well, I see it as a choice of what granularity you select for a "Component". For small projects, maybe there is nothing worth turning into a component, for larger, there definitely is. However, even for small projects I find it worth to use IoC - but then again, the types of projects we work on may be substantially different. Of course small projects never grow. I keep hearing about this mythical "feature request" but I have never seen one myself. :) /LS -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
