* Lorenzo Bettini wrote on Fri, May 22, 2009 at 03:48:49PM CEST: > No I meant: if additional libraries are shown when building with shared > library enable, this should do no harm, shouldn't it? > > In such case, one could simply not use .Private specification in .pc file.
D'oh. Yes, I guess you're right, and I'm just too darn good at misparsing your replies repeatedly. Sorry about that. Of course, as soon as you propose your software for packaging at debian.org, they will count not using .Private as bug ... ;-) Cheers, Ralf