On Aug 20, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Benoit SIGOURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Aug 12, 2007, at 11:09 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:Hello Jim, * Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 12:46:20PM CEST:On a related note, it'd sure be nice if "make -j4 check" would run its tests in parallel. Especially on an SMP system, and/or when some tests sleep for a few (interminable :-) seconds. Of course, this might not be trivial, especially trying to keep the resulting Makefile.in portable. However, even if it means I'd need to use a special option to generate a GNU-make-only Makefile.in, I'd happily use the result for day to day work.IIRC, Akim Demaille posted a patch a while ago on an automake list for this, GNU make-specific. I don't recall how much work was left to do,but on my list it's a bit on the far end.Yep: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2007-02/msg00015.html The whole idea is to have one input file per test (say a .chk file) that produces a .log file. We can then benefit from the parallelism of make with implicit rules (exactly like for .c -> .o). The file has slightly evolved since then but I can post an updated version if someone is interested.That'd be great. FYI, in testing this, I've been using check.mk from vaucanson-trunk. Is that what you mean?
Not exactly, in fact Akim and I use this piece of Makefile in several other projects, some of which are unfortunately not open source. You can find a more up to date version at:
http://www.tsunanet.net/~tsuna/check.mkIt has a couple of bug fixes and enhancements compared to that in vaucanson HEAD (which ought to be updated).
I hope this helps. Cheers, -- Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna EPITA Research and Development Laboratory
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part