Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | >>>>> "Jim" == Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > | Ok, I re-read your message. Why do we ever run `missing --run :'? | > | That seems weird. | | Jim> I didn't know off hand either, but found this in | Jim> automake/m4/missing.m4: | | Jim> if eval "$MISSING --run :"; then | | What if we just change this to "$MISSING --run true"? | Is true a builtin on Ultrix? I.E., will it cause the problem? Hmm... I just tried it and it works fine. Good idea.
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Alexandre Oliva
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Akim Demaille
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Akim Demaille
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Tom Tromey
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Tom Tromey
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Tom Tromey
- Jim Meyering