>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jim> | prog=$1 | shift | "$prog" "$@" Jim> His suggested change didn't have double quotes around $prog. Jim> Besides, if you do use double quotes around it, as you've Jim> written, above, then Ultrix4.4's /bin/sh fails in exactly the Jim> same way as if you'd used "$@". Can it be again one of these problems related to the 8th bit? Still, there is one important question raised by your patch: does it work properly when passed `bison -y' as $1? (Actually, I don't know if the invocation makes `bison -y' be $1, or if `bison' and `-y' are already split. If the latter, then fine, we have found a workaround. Still, I wonder to what extend what you found means we should change all the place where we invoke `"$@"' as command line. The only restriction is wrt $1 being `:'?
- `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Alexandre Oliva
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Akim Demaille
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Akim Demaille
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Akim Demaille
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Alexandre Oliva
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Akim Demaille
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Akim Demaille
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Tom Tromey
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Tom Tromey
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Tom Tromey
- Re: `missing' needs patch for Ultrix4.4 Jim Meyering