Hi, Ossama.

Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> However, sometimes this can't be avoided in the case of inlined
> functions (e.g. C++).  It isn't always feasible, particularly in
> terms of performance, to always keep function implementations hidden
> within the library.  One could argue that the inlined functions
> shouldn't depend on the output of configure.  On that point, I would
> agree.  If you had a solution for this problem then I'd be eternally
> grateful! :-)

In that case, I would vote for the solution already mentioned by me
and other people in this thread, namely to generate header files so
that they don't depend on the configure variables, which obviously has
the downside of making them machine-dependent.

/assar

Reply via email to