On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:28:05AM -0500, Mark D. Roth wrote:
> I'm not sure that I agree that having a site macro directory makes it
> any more likely for developers to screw things up.  However, even if
> that is the case, we can have autoconf cache any macros that get used
> in the aclocal.m4 file, just like aclocal does.  That way you still
> get a copy of all of the necessary macros as part of the distributed
> package, but it happens automatically and without the need to install
> a seperate package.  Would that address this objection?

Sounds like what you want is very similar to aclocal.  Why not instead
try to get aclocal shipped with autoconf instead of automake?

-- 
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:: http://superduper.net/ 
:: PGP :: D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.4 2002/04/27 11:54:02 samc Exp $

Attachment: msg07390/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to