On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:28:05AM -0500, Mark D. Roth wrote: > I'm not sure that I agree that having a site macro directory makes it > any more likely for developers to screw things up. However, even if > that is the case, we can have autoconf cache any macros that get used > in the aclocal.m4 file, just like aclocal does. That way you still > get a copy of all of the necessary macros as part of the distributed > package, but it happens automatically and without the need to install > a seperate package. Would that address this objection?
Sounds like what you want is very similar to aclocal. Why not instead try to get aclocal shipped with autoconf instead of automake? -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP :: D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.4 2002/04/27 11:54:02 samc Exp $
msg07390/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature