On Thu, 16 May 2002, Mark D. Roth wrote: > On Thu May 16 05:59 2002 -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > > I'm not sure that I agree that having a site macro directory makes it > any more likely for developers to screw things up. However, even if > that is the case, we can have autoconf cache any macros that get used > in the aclocal.m4 file, just like aclocal does. That way you still > get a copy of all of the necessary macros as part of the distributed > package, but it happens automatically and without the need to install > a seperate package. Would that address this objection?
btw - That's one of automake's misfeatures: choosing a name which was already in use for a different purpose. -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
