On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:44:44AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > On 8 Apr 2002, Akim Demaille wrote: > > > Actually, YMMV. It depdends how `lucky' you were. Given that the > > name of the macro to be defined was not quoted, the macro was > > expanded. In typical cases, it gave more argument to define than 2, > > hence an error. > > not really (I generally quote the argument of AC_DEFUN).
Sorry, I didn't mean you, I was referring to the definition of AC_DEFUN itself, which used to use $1 (the macro name) without quoting it.
