>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas E Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> to reopen the wound since 2.5x adds salt). >> 2.13 died on it. That's very different. Thomas> no - 2.13 ignored it (I noticed this when I was making the Thomas> macro for the prereq). Actually, YMMV. It depdends how `lucky' you were. Given that the name of the macro to be defined was not quoted, the macro was expanded. In typical cases, it gave more argument to define than 2, hence an error. Thomas> If you want to make comparisons, try to stick to things that Thomas> you've tested. ha ha! My good ol' Thomas. Keep up the bad mood! :)
