Mike Castle writes: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 01:51:27PM -0700, Matt Watson wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out the best way to fix this. Is the > > Fix the code so it doesn't require knowledge of the endianess of the > machine. > > Personally, I'd vote for getting rid of AC_C_BIGENDIAN. No need to in > supporting poor programming. Great idea if you have protocols and file formats defined around this. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
- AC_C_BIGENDIAN vs. Darwin Matt Watson
- Re: AC_C_BIGENDIAN vs. Darwin Lars J. Aas
- Re: AC_C_BIGENDIAN vs. Darwin Mike Castle
- Re: AC_C_BIGENDIAN vs. Darwin Matt Watson
- Re: AC_C_BIGENDIAN vs. Darwin Russ Allbery
- Re: AC_C_BIGENDIAN vs. Darwin Paul Eggert
- Re: AC_C_BIGENDIAN vs. Darwin Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AC_C_BIGENDIAN vs. Darwin Mo DeJong
- Re: AC_C_BIGENDIAN vs. Darwin Ed L Cashin