Re: AC_C_BIGENDIAN vs. Darwin

[Russ Allbery]

Mike Castle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Personally, I'd vote for getting rid of AC_C_BIGENDIAN.  No need to in
> supporting poor programming.

I use it to allow more optimized versions of algorithms like MD5 where you
can skip additional memory copies on hosts with some endianness.  I'd be
pretty unhappy if it disappeared.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>