On 16 Feb 2001, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 16, 2001, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I see. But we don't need reentrancy for configure, do we? > > Nope. Not even for config.status, AFAIK. We just need concurrency, > not reentrancy. Unless a new requirement has entered the picture. Sorry, I meant concurrency. Regards, Pavel Roskin
- [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Akim Demaille
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Akim Demaille
- RE: [patch] remove config.status race condition Tim Van Holder
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition akim