On Feb 16, 2001, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see. But we don't need reentrancy for configure, do we? Nope. Not even for config.status, AFAIK. We just need concurrency, not reentrancy. Unless a new requirement has entered the picture. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Akim Demaille
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Akim Demaille
- RE: [patch] remove config.status race condition Tim Van Holder
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin