On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 10:11:23AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Yes, that version should have been named 3.x too, imho.
> 
> No. We pretend to be fully compatible with correctly written
> configure.in's.

well, one reliable test for that is whether one can use the same
configure.in on old/new versions (2.13 and 2.50).

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com

Reply via email to