Hi folks, Thanks for the changes by including as_expr there is a problem with the test, and/or another bug in QNX (I suspect). The code: expr a : '\(a\)' echo $? b=`expr a : '\(a\)'` echo $b,$? Gives: a 1 a,0 The `` seem to affect the return code from the expr. This means QNX still thinks it has a working expr. Looks like this needs a different sort of test. Once I tell QNX that it does not have a working expr (and I fix the CONFIG_FILES issue) then I can successfully run make. Regards David
- Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different results on QNX ... David Morgan
- Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different results on... akim
- Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different result... Akim Demaille
- Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different results on... Pavel Roskin
- FYI: Reading the $? of an assignment (Was: expr ...... Akim Demaille
- Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different results on... David Morgan
- Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different results on... Pavel Roskin
- Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different results on... Akim Demaille
- Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different results on... Lars J. Aas
- Re: expr ... and `expr ...` return different results on... Paul Eggert