On 18 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Nov 17, 2000, Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So a solaris cross cygwin compiler would define EXEEXT to be .exe, > > however, OBJEXT would be .o because it was compiled on a solaris > > box. > > I suppose a compiler that targets Cygwin will create .obj object files > regardless of its host platform. I.e., when using a Cygwin compiler > (such that --host=cygwin), you'd get OBJEXT=.obj, regardless of the > build platform, on which the compiler runs. No, it depends in what your compiler outputs. % cat tmp.c int i; % i386-mingw32msvc-gcc -c tmp.c % ls tmp.* tmp.c tmp.o % ./i586-cygwin32-gcc -c tmp.c % ls tmp.* tmp.c tmp.o You would only get a .obj file if you were using VC++. Mo DeJong Red Hat Inc
- Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Mo DeJong
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Akim Demaille
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Eric Christopher
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Mo DeJong
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Mo DeJong
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Christopher Faylor
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Christopher Faylor
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Earnie Boyd
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Mo DeJong
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Morten Eriksen
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Earnie Boyd
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Paul Berrevoets