On Nov 17, 2000, Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So a solaris cross cygwin compiler would define EXEEXT to be .exe, > however, OBJEXT would be .o because it was compiled on a solaris > box. I suppose a compiler that targets Cygwin will create .obj object files regardless of its host platform. I.e., when using a Cygwin compiler (such that --host=cygwin), you'd get OBJEXT=.obj, regardless of the build platform, on which the compiler runs. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Mo DeJong
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Akim Demaille
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Eric Christopher
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Mo DeJong
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Mo DeJong
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Christopher Faylor
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Christopher Faylor
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Earnie Boyd
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Mo DeJong
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Morten Eriksen
- Re: Where did the Cygwin and Mingw checks go? Earnie Boyd