On Jul 21, 2000, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If support for bounded pointers is added to Autoconf, certainly > support should also be added to support compiler profiling options, See what I mean? I don't think profiling support is important for autoconf, because that's something the builder should know about. But I think BP support is, because it has to do with using pre-installed libraries with a certain feature enabled, namely, BP. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Autoconf support for bounds checking? Greg McGary
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds checking? Paul Eggert
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds checking? Greg McGary
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds checking? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds checking? Greg McGary
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds chec... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds ... Greg McGary
- Re: Autoconf support for bou... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds ... Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: Autoconf support for bou... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds ... Thomas Dickey
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds checking? Paul Eggert
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds checking? Greg McGary
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds chec... Akim Demaille
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds chec... Paul Eggert
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds ... Greg McGary
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds checking? Akim Demaille
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds checking? Akim Demaille
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds checking? Thomas Dickey
- Re: Autoconf support for bounds checking? Paul Eggert