Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 04:34:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have noticed that there are a number of packages that include extra code to test for and enable the -pipe option to gcc. I think it might be a good idea to add the -pipe option to the default CFLAGS if gcc is detected and the -pipe option is supported. What do you think? It's pretty easy to write C++ code for which -pipe is slower on a reasonable machine. Both the compiler and assembler require an enormous amount of memory, and the system starts swapping. I've seen this myself on a 64MB system. Ian
- Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Mo DeJong
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Mo DeJong
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by d... Mo DeJong
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by d... Akim Demaille
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Harlan Stenn
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Akim Demaille
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Lars Hecking
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Marty Leisner
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Lars Hecking
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Mo DeJong