On Jul 4, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it makes the build go faster for 99% of the folks out there, we > should use it. Does it? I really don't know. Taking your argument further, why shouldn't -pipe be the default in GCC when it is supported? This wouldn't require any changes in autoconf. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Mo DeJong
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Mo DeJong
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by d... Mo DeJong
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by d... Akim Demaille
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Harlan Stenn
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Akim Demaille
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Lars Hecking
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Marty Leisner
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Lars Hecking
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Mo DeJong