Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:41:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Perhaps the simple packages that don't use AC_CANONICAL_* and don't have config.{guess,sub} could still understand "--host". But it will have only limited effects: - $host_alias and $ac_tool_prefix will be defined - "configure" will assume that we are cross-compiling - AC_TRY_RUN tests will not be run - AC_PATH_TOOL will test for tools beginning with $ac_tool_prefix Note that the value of $host_alias will not be compared to anything. I.e. if you specify "--host" you are cross-compiling. $host, $host_os, $host_cpu and $host_vendor will never be defined. Packages that include AC_CANONICAL_* will have all those variables defined. $host will be compared with $build. Cross-compiling will be assumed when and only when $host != $build Does this sound reasonable? This sounds reasonable to me. A package without AC_CANONICAL_* should presumably still understand --build, for consistency. If both --build and --host were specified, they could be compared. Ian
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Paul Berrevoets
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Christopher Seawood
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Tom Tromey
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Peter Eisentraut