>>>>> "cls" == Christopher Seawood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: cls> In the Mozilla project, I chose to use $host != $target to be cls> indicative of a cross-compiled build. This is already wrong, because target is only meaningful for a compiler or some other part of a toolchain. Mozilla is a so-called "host tool" -- its configure script should only care about host and build. build: where you run configure host: where you run the program you built (e.g., Mozilla or gcc) target: where you generate code for (gcc) or what you debug (gdb) cls> When would it be valid to have $host = $target and still be cls> cross-compiling? A while back I had to do some work on Windows. I built my Windows-native gcc on Linux by using --build=linux, --host=cygwin, and --target=cygwin. The result was a gcc executable which ran on Windows and which generated Windows executables. Tom
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Paul Berrevoets
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Christopher Seawood
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Tom Tromey
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Tom Tromey
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Tom Tromey
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor