On Apr 21, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21 Apr 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Apr 21, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > So if it should have been "internal" then why do I need to add the >> > AC_CANONICAL_BUILD macro to my configure.in file to get cross >> > compiling to work? > But the docs tell me I only need AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM if I am > a tool in a cross compiler toolchain. Yep, that's right. The point is that you should seldom need information about the build platform. So AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM, that sets build, host and target, is useful for cross-compiler toolchains because it sets target, and target is useless for any other kind of application. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guaranį, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patc... Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (... Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (... Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (... Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (... Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (... Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (... Pavel Roskin