On Apr 21, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The documentation seems to indicate that the only macro I > would need was AC_CANONICAL_HOST? Are the docs wrong about that? You'd seldom need information about the build platform, and you'd only need information about the target platform when building the toolchain. > No that you mention it, the 2.13 docs do not even mention > AC_CANONICAL_HOST. Was this something that was added recently? No, it's not recent, but I think it was supposed to be something internal. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guaranį, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me
- Is this a bug in autoconf? Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autocon... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autocon... Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autocon... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autocon... Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autocon... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autocon... Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (... Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autocon... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autocon... Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autocon... Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autocon... Akim Demaille