That's fine with me, but I still would like to know why you didn't
prefer using the right includes.
Akim
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe Akim Demaille
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe Assar Westerlund
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe Akim Demaille
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe Akim Demaille
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe Franz Sirl
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe Ossama Othman
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe Akim Demaille
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 safe Franz Sirl
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= 2.95 ... Akim Demaille
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ >= ... Franz Sirl
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ &g... Akim Demaille
- Re: Fix some tests to be g+... Paul Eggert
- Re: Fix some tests to be g+... Jim Meyering
- Re: Fix some tests to be g+... Franz Sirl
- Re: Fix some tests to be g+... Akim Demaille
- Re: Fix some tests to be g++ &g... Akim Demaille
- Re: Fix some tests to be g+... Alexandre Oliva
