Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:26:38 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I very much like the bug report quoted below, and I suggest that it be put into the autoconf source code somewhere, either next to the code that generates config.cache, or perhaps into a new section of documentation that discusses autoconf portability issues. It would also be helpful to put the Ultrix version number into the bug report. The Ultrix version number is 4.0. Ian
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Paul Eggert
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Ian Lance Taylor
- Portable programming (was: config.cache considered harmfu... Russ Allbery
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Didier Verna
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Felix Lee
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Harlan Stenn
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Felix Lee
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz