Hello, Martin! > Let's think about when you would ever want to reuse a cache within a > simple single GNU package. I claim you _never_ want to reuse that > config.cache file sitting in your foo-1.9 directory. Why are you > re-running configure, anyways, instead of just running `make'? Because I want to try a different _configuration_: CFLAGS=-ggdb3 ./configure --enable-cute-feature --without-bloat Cache really saves time when I turn on/off debugging and optional features. It remains valid in this case. Regards, Pavel Roskin
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Tom Tromey
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Russ Allbery
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Tom Tromey
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Pavel Roskin
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Lars Hecking
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Olly Betts
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Olly Betts
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Pavel Roskin
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Harlan Stenn
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Pavel Roskin
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Greg A. Woods