On Feb 25, 2000, Martin Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I support Alexandre's idea. So do I :-) :-) > I think I'm getting motivated to fix _all_ the dependencies in the > XEmacs build environment. How about `automake'ing it? You'd get automatic dependency tracking for free, as long as you use CVS automake. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Enjoy Guaranį Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me
- Portable programming (was: config.cache consider... Russ Allbery
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Didier Verna
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Felix Lee
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Harlan Stenn
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Felix Lee
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Alexandre Oliva
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Tom Tromey
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Russ Allbery
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Tom Tromey
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Pavel Roskin
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Lars Hecking
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Olly Betts