Thanks, Sabrina! RFC Editor/kc
> On Apr 25, 2025, at 3:40 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-mat...@iana.org> > wrote: > > Hi Karen, > > These changes are complete. Please see > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/cwt > https://www.iana.org/assignments/jwt > https://www.iana.org/assignments/device-identification > https://www.iana.org/assignments/cbor-tags > > Thanks, > Sabrina > > On Wed Apr 23 19:24:07 2025, kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org wrote: >> Dear IANA, >> >> Please update the following registries to match the edited document at >> "https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-diff.html";. >> >> 1) In the "CBOR Web Token (CWT) Claims" registry >> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/cwt/>, please remove "OpenID Connect >> Core 1.0” from the Reference column. >> >> OLD: >> Nonce >> Nonce >> eat_nonce >> 10 >> bstr or array >> IETF >> [OpenID Connect Core 1.0][RFC-ietf-rats-eat-30] >> >> NEW: >> Nonce >> Nonce >> eat_nonce >> 10 >> bstr or array >> IETF >> [RFC-ietf-rats-eat-30] >> >> 2) In the "JSON Web Token Claims” >> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/jwt/> and "CBOR Web Token (CWT) >> Claims" <https://www.iana.org/assignments/cwt/> registries, please >> update the claim descriptions as follows: >> >> OLD: >> UEID The Universal Entity ID >> >> SUEIDs Semi-permanent UEIDs >> >> Debug Status Indicates status of debug facilities >> >> EAT Profile Indicates the EAT profile followed >> >> Boot Count The number times the entity or submodule has been >> booted >> >> Measurements Measurements of the software, memory configuration and >> such on the entity >> >> Intended Use Indicates intended use of the EAT >> >> NEW: >> UEID Universal Entity ID >> >> SUEIDs Semipermanent UEIDs >> >> Debug Status The status of debug facilities >> >> EAT Profile The EAT profile followed >> >> Boot Count The number of times the entity or submodule has been >> booted >> >> Measurements Measurements of the software, memory configuration, and >> such on the entity >> >> Intended Use The intended use of the EAT >> >> 3) In the "DEV URN Subtypes” registry >> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/device-identification/>, please >> update: >> >> OLD: >> ueid Universal Entity Identifier >> sueid Semi-permanent Universal Entity Identifier >> >> NEW: >> ueid Universal Entity ID >> sueid Semipermanent Universal Entity ID >> >> 4) In the "CBOR Tags" registry <https://www.iana.org/assignments/cbor- >> tags/>, please remove “[RFC-ietf-rats-eat-30, Section 5]” from the >> Semantics column and add “Section 5” to the Reference column. >> >> OLD: >> 602 >> array >> Detached EAT Bundle [RFC-ietf-rats-eat-30, Section 5] >> [RFC-ietf-rats-eat-30] >> >> NEW: >> 602 >> array >> Detached EAT Bundle >> [RFC-ietf-rats-eat-30, Section 5] >> >> Thank you in advance! >> >> Best regards, >> RFC Editor/kc >> >> >>> On Apr 23, 2025, at 11:53 AM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc- >>> editor.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Roman! >>> >>> Thank you for providing your approval of the changes; we have updated >>> the AUTH48 page at "https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9767"; to >>> reflect the status. >>> >>> We will now ask IANA to update their registries to match the edited >>> document. Once they have completed the process, we will inform the >>> authors. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> RFC Editor/kc >>> >>>> On Apr 23, 2025, at 11:02 AM, Roman Danyliw via auth48archive >>>> <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Karen! >>>> >>>> I confirmed with the WG. I approved these changes. >>>> >>>> Roman >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 1:19 PM >>>> To: Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org>; lgl securitytheory.com >>>> <l...@securitytheory.com>; Giridhar Mandyam >>>> <giridhar.mand...@gmail.com>; Jeremy O'Donoghue >>>> <jodon...@qti.qualcomm.com>; Carl Wallace >>>> <c...@redhoundsoftware.com> >>>> Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>; rats-...@ietf.org; rats- >>>> chairs <rats-cha...@ietf.org>; Smith, Ned <ned.sm...@intel.com>; >>>> auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> >>>> Subject: AD [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9711 <draft-ietf-rats-eat-31> >>>> for your review >>>> >>>> Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments >>>> unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Laurence and *Roman (AD), >>>> >>>> Thank you for your reply. >>>> >>>> *Roman, please let us know the status of this document. Note that we >>>> await your approval of the following, which can be viewed at >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48diff.html: >>>> >>>> Sections 3, 4.1, 4.2.3.2, 4.2.3.3, 4.2.10, 4.2.18, 5, 6.3.6, 7.3, >>>> 7.3.1, 7.3.2, and 9.1 Appendices A.1.7, A.2.2, A.2.3, B.2, and D >>>> >>>> —Files (please refresh)— >>>> >>>> The updated XML file is here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.xml >>>> >>>> The updated output files are here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.txt >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.pdf >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.html >>>> >>>> These diff files show all changes made during AUTH48: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48diff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48rfcdiff.html (side >>>> by side) >>>> >>>> These diff files show only the change made during the last editing >>>> round: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-lastdiff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-lastrfcdiff.html (side by >>>> side) >>>> >>>> These diff files show all changes made to date: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-diff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-rfcdiff.html (side by >>>> side) >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> RFC Editor/kc >>>> >>>>> On Apr 21, 2025, at 9:43 AM, Laurence Lundblade via auth48archive >>>>> <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Karen, >>>>> >>>>> I went through and checked all 19 instances (7 I asked for, plus 12 >>>>> you found). They all look good. Thank you for taking the initiative >>>>> and fixing them all to make the document consistent! >>>>> >>>>> LL >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 18, 2025, at 4:56 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc- >>>>>> editor.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello Laurence, >>>>>> >>>>>> We believe the request is to make “Section X of [RFCXXX]” all one >>>>>> clickable link; however, that format is not currently used in the >>>>>> RFC series. Note that there are 19 instances of “Section X of >>>>>> [RFCXXX]”, so only updating the 7 instances that were outlined in >>>>>> GitHub would introduce inconsistency within the document (as well >>>>>> as within the RFC series). >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that we did find one reference that was not clickable; we >>>>>> updated the format as follows: >>>>>> >>>>>> OLD: >>>>>> When COSE protection is used, the profile should specify whether >>>>>> COSE tags are used or not. >>>>>> Note that RFC 8392 requires COSE tags be used in a CWT tag. >>>>>> >>>>>> NEW: >>>>>> When COSE protection is used, the profile should specify whether >>>>>> COSE tags are used or not. >>>>>> Note that [RFC8392] requires COSE tags be used in a CWT tag. >>>>>> >>>>>> —Files (please refresh)— >>>>>> >>>>>> The updated XML file is here: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.xml >>>>>> >>>>>> The updated output files are here: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.txt >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.pdf >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711.html >>>>>> >>>>>> These diff files show all changes made during AUTH48: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48diff.html >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-auth48rfcdiff.html >>>>>> (side >>>>>> by side) >>>>>> >>>>>> These diff files show only the change made during the last editing >>>>>> round: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-lastdiff.html >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-lastrfcdiff.html (side >>>>>> by >>>>>> side) >>>>>> >>>>>> These diff files show all changes made to date: >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-diff.html >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9711-rfcdiff.html (side by >>>>>> side) >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> RFC Editor/kc >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Apr 18, 2025, at 10:03 AM, Laurence Lundblade >>>>>>> <l...@securitytheory.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi RFC Editor, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As part of the review Roman conducted on the Location NULL/NaN >>>>>>> issue a suggestion was made to improve the references to sections >>>>>>> of referenced RFCs. The EAT authors would like to request the >>>>>>> following changes. The change is only to make the “Section X” a >>>>>>> clickable link. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Old: >>>>>>> Section X of {{RFCYYYY}} >>>>>>> >>>>>>> New: >>>>>>> {{Section X of RFCYYYY}} >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are 7 occurrences of this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can see the change in the EAT GitHub repo here: >>>>>>> https://github.com/ietf-rats- >>>>>>> wg/eat/commit/462fbba8cf1449bbd648f3ec3 >>>>>>> f4f10af02b07ae4 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LL >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To >>>>> unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org >>>> >>>> -- >>>> auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org >>> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
