El jue, 22-05-2025 a las 16:21 +0200, Actionless Loveless escribió: > Debian/Ubuntu have `update-alternatives` [..] case).
Yes, it is true, in the past this topic was discussed and a tool similar to `update-alternatives` was discarded. Maybe it would be interesting to take up that topic again, not so much for the tool but for deciding which binaries are “reserved”. In any case and for now if we stick to Arch's pure and simple rules, the correct package name is edit, the binary should be `edit` and should be marked as conflicting with all packages that can create a `/usr/bin/edit` (which is what is already done). Greetings. -- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
